Practical Impact of D.C. Circuit’s Ruling on Foreign Broadcasters and Copyright Liability

Related Stories

• 

  When Are Short Phrases in Songs Protectable?

  By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein

  It’s a common fact pattern: A songwriter alleges that another songwriter has infringed the lyrics of Song A by using a similar short phrase, frequently a current slang phrase, in the lyrics of Song B. Claims like this do not often succeed because “words and short phrases such as names, titles, and slogans” are “not subject to copyright.”

  Read More ›

• 

  How Judges Are Interpreting Supreme Court’s Copyright ‘Registration’ Ruling

  By Stan Soocher

  In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, under 17 U.S.C. §411(a), “registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright” — that is, acts on a registration application, rather than when an applicant delivers the registration materials to the Copyright Office.

  Read More ›

• 

  Challenges to Evidence of Copyright Ownership

  By Stan Soocher

  There has been a long-term debate over whether sound recordings can be copyright works made for hire. Sound recordings don’t appear in the list of works for hire set out in §101 of the Copyright Act of 1976, though record labels argue recordings can be deemed so as a “compilation” or a “contribution to a collective work,” per §101.

  Read More ›