Follow Us
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since the passage of UETA and ESIGN in 1999/2000, I have been fascinated as to exactly how the legal terminology of these and other “digital security” statutes equates to actual cryptographic methods. When someone writes a piece of software that “meets and/or exceeds these requirements,” and are “warranted for compliance” under these acts, how do contracting officers, lawyers, judges and everyone involved understand? It isn’t quite like a set of map directions: it’s difficult to draw a straight line from act to software function. As the digital landscape continues to grow and expand in scope, how does the legal profession keep up?
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
Privacy Risk Management & Data Minimization
By Therese Craparo and Sarah Bruno
Many organizations — from growing start-ups to mature, well-established companies — are struggling with the new reality of what it means to manage data in an era of digital transformation, exponential data growth, and expanding regulatory regimes focusing on data management and minimization.
Digital Dibs: Rival Views of Generative AI Copyrights
By Greg Moreman
GAI platforms like ChatGPT and OpenAI often require very little human input, shattering this legal landscape’s framework by posing a simple question: Who authored the material? We’ll explore how two countries are answering this question in different ways.
Empowering Legal Professionals: Navigating AI Solutions for Efficiency and Data Security
By Michael T. Murray and Tony Donofrio
Integrating AI tools into legal practice without compromising the security of sensitive client information is a paramount concern. In this article, we’ll examine how AI is revolutionizing certain aspects of legal work, while offering best practices for employing these technologies and providing guidance for legal professionals in selecting the right AI products and service providers.
Pitfalls In Personal Device Data Collection
By Marjorie Peerce and Marguerite O’Brien
The increasing frequency of “bring your own device” policies creates serious implications for subpoena recipients and litigants to ensure compliance with discovery demands. And courts across the country consider such personal mobile data fair game. To avoid pitfalls —and sanctions — counsel must take proactive steps to ensure proper preservation and collection of personal mobile data and verify that clients comply.
Copyright © ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
