Are Allegations of Lack of Medical Necessity in False Claims Act Cases a Basis for Settlement or Trial?

Related Stories

• 

  The Yates Memo is Here to Stay: Signs of Increasing Efforts to Hold Individuals Criminally Liable for Corporate Wrongdoing

  By Carolyn H. Kendall and Yune D. Emeritz

  It is axiomatic that companies cannot do wrong without the actions of individuals. However, the trend over the past few decades, with a few exceptions, has been that individuals generally were not prosecuted for their roles in corporate wrongdoing that harmed the public welfare. However, there appears to be a recent escalation in prosecutions of corporate executives.

  Read More ›

• 

  Will the EU-Japan Data Transfer Partnership Agreement Have Global Influence?

  By Samantha Green

  With countries around the world examining and strengthening their data protection laws, this agreement could be the first of many and will undoubtedly have global repercussions.

  Read More ›

• 

  “Spoofing” as Fraud: A Novel and Untested Theory of Prosecution

  By Jodi Misher Peikin and Justin Roller

  The DOJ has signaled its intent to pursue prosecutions for spoofing — which the law defines as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution” — aggressively. This article begins with a brief discussion of the elements that the government must prove to establish commodities fraud and wire fraud. It then examines recent spoofing prosecutions that raise important questions about the applicability of the traditional fraud statutes to spoofing-related activity. How the federal courts answer these open questions will have significant implications for participants in the commodities markets.

  Read More ›