Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ever since Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., 13 NY3d 270 (2009), it has been an article of faith that a building’s receipt of J-51 benefits means that all of the apartments therein automatically become rent-stabilized. If those apartments were already rent-stabilized, they become, under the logic of Roberts, stabilized a second time. The second layer of rent stabilization has the effect of barring luxury deregulation, at least until J–51 benefits expire. See, Schiffren v Lawlor, 101 AD3d 456 (1st Dept 2012).
*May exclude premium content
By Stewart E. Sterk
Can tenants maintain a class action against landlords asserting a pattern and practice of illegal conduct when the various plaintiff tenants have been injured by different forms of allegedly wrongful conduct?
Notice to Cure Did Not Violate RPL 235-f
Certificate of No Exterior Effect Upheld
Emotional Support Dog Determination Upheld