Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A landlord's insurer was not entitled to recovery where the lease allocated the risk of building damage to the landlord and required it to obtain insurance, which then covered both the landlord's and tenant's potential liability, leaving the insurance company without subrogation rights against the tenant. Youell v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 497 (2018).
The commercial landlord and tenant entered into a lease which stated that the landlord would obtain insurance for the building and the tenant would insure any of its personal property located within the building. The landlord did obtain such insurance from The Cincinnati Insurance Company (CIC). The building was damaged by fire during the lease term and CIC paid the landlord $227,653 for the building's damages.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.