Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This is the third in a series of articles exploring whether parties to a commercial lease can contractually waive a tenant’s right to seek a Yellowstone injunction. The first article, “Are Yellowstone Waivers Enforceable?,” NYLJ, April 10, 2014, at 4, col. 1, was written before any appellate authority existed on the issue. Our second article, “As it Turns Out, Yellowstone Waivers Are Enforceable,” 34 NY Real Estate Law Reporter 5 (April, 2018), written four years later, discussed the evolution of the law following the seminal holding in 159 MP Corp. v Redbridge Bedford, LLC, 160 AD3d 176 (2d Dept 2018). (Both prior articles were co-authored by Joshua Kopelowitz and Jeffrey Turkel.) In Redbridge, the Appellate Division Second Department, citing our article, held that parties to a commercial contract are free to limit a tenant’s ability to seek a declaratory judgment and, specifically, a Yellowstone injunction. On May 7, 2019, the Court of Appeals, in 159 MP Corp. v Redbridge Bedford, LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 03526, affirmed the Second Department’s ruling and reasoning, thereby leaving no doubt that a contractual waiver of a right to seek a declaratory judgment and/or a Yellowstone injunction in a commercial lease is enforceable.
*May exclude premium content
By Stewart E. Sterk
Jeffrey Turkel’s lead article in last month’s issue focused on the Regina Metropolitan case, in which the Court of Appeals invalidated a number of…
Condominium Lien Enjoys Priority Over Mortgage
Business Judgment Rule Precludes Challenge to Cancellation of Shares
Conditional Payments Do Not Restart Statute Of Limitations On Foreclosure Action
Questions of Fact About Purchasers’ Good Faith In Making Mortgage Applications
Questions of Fact Remain on Implied Easement Claims
Presumption of Hostility Supports Adverse Possession Claim
Questions of Fact Remain About County’s Liability for Fuel Oil Discharge
Prohibition of Advertising Sign Upheld
Failure to Consider Rezoning Application Not Subject to Judicial Review