Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

Former Keppel Lawyer Who Cooperated with U.S. Government Fined and Sentenced to Probation for His Role in Petrobras Bribery Scheme

Jeffrey Chow, 61, a former in-house attorney at Singapore-based shipyard operator Keppel Offshore & Marine Ltd (Keppel) was sentenced on November 15 to one year of probation and a US$75,000 fine in a U.S. District Court for his role in the company's overseas bribery in connection with the Petrobras scandal. Chow, a former Keppel legal department director, entered into a plea agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2017 and plead guilty to one count of conspiring to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). As part of his plea deal, Chow agreed to cooperate with the government in its prosecution of his former employer, its U.S. subsidiary, Keppel Offshore & Marine USA, and joint venture partner, Technip FMC for FCPA violations in Brazil.

Chow's sentencing also followed the December 2017 agreement by Keppel to pay combined penalties of over $422 million to resolve enforcement actions in the U.S., Brazil, and Singapore in connection with bribes paid to executives at Brazilian state-owned oil company Petrobras and a Workers' Party of Brazil official. The majority of these penalties were ordered to be paid overseas: approximately 50% to Brazilian and 25% to Singaporean authorities; and marked the first coordinated anti-bribery action between the DOJ and its Singaporean counterpart. The bribes, paid to assist Keppel to secure rig-building work, had been disguised as legitimate consulting fees paid to third-party intermediaries. In a separate related settlement, oil and gas services company Technip FMC agreed to pay criminal penalties of $296 million to resolve FCPA violations in both Brazil and Iraq.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.