Counsel Concerns: 3rd Circuit Decides Lawyers’ Dispute over Video Game Litigation Client

Read These Next

• 

  How Judges Are Interpreting Supreme Court’s Copyright ‘Registration’ Ruling

  By Stan Soocher

  In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, under 17 U.S.C. §411(a), “registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright” — that is, acts on a registration application, rather than when an applicant delivers the registration materials to the Copyright Office.

  Read More ›

• 

  What Would End of Film Studio Consent Decrees Mean?

  By Karen Hoffman Lent and Kenneth Schwartz

  In November, the DOJ asked a federal district court to terminate the Paramount Consent Decrees, a set of rules governing major film studios for the last 70 years. In effect, these rules prohibited movie studios from owning downstream movie theaters and banned a variety of vertical agreements, such as block booking — the practice of bundling multiple films into one theater license.

  Read More ›

• 

  IP Issues and Esports Athletes

  By Frank Ready

  A new esports-centric survey released by the law firm of Foley & Lardner projects that esports revenues will climb above the $1 billion mark this year. But the increased stakes and growing sophistication of the industry will likely not be without their headaches.

  Read More ›

• 

  Challenges to Evidence of Copyright Ownership

  By Stan Soocher

  There has been a long-term debate over whether sound recordings can be copyright works made for hire. Sound recordings don’t appear in the list of works for hire set out in §101 of the Copyright Act of 1976, though record labels argue recordings can be deemed so as a “compilation” or a “contribution to a collective work,” per §101.

  Read More ›