Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Attorney Proffers: Practical Considerations and Some Law Too
One of the frequently used tools in a white-collar defense attorney's kit — the attorney proffer of facts on behalf of a client — is not uniformly defined and will often proceed without any written or express oral understanding as to what ground rules apply. Unlike client interviews, which typically are governed by a written proffer or so called "Queen for a Day" agreement that provides the client certain limited but defined protections against his or her statements being affirmatively used in a later proceeding, federal prosecutors generally pronounce no formal policies regarding attorney proffers.
Attorney proffers can be used for a host of reasons — to demonstrate innocence, to lay out facts as a foundation for a plea deal, or to show how a client can be valuable to the government as a witness. Attorney proffers may be highly beneficial for both sides: They can provide the defense lawyer with an early opportunity to influence the government's view of the case and allow prosecutors to learn information that may properly inform their view of an individual or entity and further their investigation without negotiating immunity or addressing other testimonial issues. For defense counsel, a critical but sometimes elusive prerequisite is to have done enough investigation and spent enough time with the client to have sufficient confidence that the information to be proffered is reliable. Handled with care, however, an attorney proffer can provide a critical opportunity to gauge a prosecutor's reaction while limiting the risk of compromising the client's potential defense at trial.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.