Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

A CCPA Private Right of Action on the Horizon

By David Keating, Jim Harvey and Dan Felz
May 01, 2020

While much of the privacy community has been focused — for good reason — on the COVID-19 public health emergency, plaintiffs' counsel have started to lay the groundwork for a broad private right of action under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Cal. Civ. Code §§1798.100 to 1798.198.

The first part of this article provides an overview of how the CCPA addresses private rights of action. The second section summarizes recent class action complaints that attempt to use CCPA violations as the basis for class-wide claims, either via claims asserted directly under the CCPA or through the California Unfair Competition Law. The third and final part provides suggestions for prioritizing activity in CCPA compliance programs in this new litigation environment.

Part One: The CCPA and Private Rights of Action

The California Consumer Privacy Act was the end product of a negotiation with the backers of a proposed ballot initiative, Californians for Consumer Privacy, that, if successful, would have granted California residents the right to be notified of and to opt out from sales of personal information. See, The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Ballot Initiative No. 17-0027, draft stamped as received by California Attorney General on Oct. 9, 2017. One of the primary objectives of the business community in supporting the negotiations was to eliminate a proposed private right of action. See, California Senate, Senate Judiciary Committee, Tuesday, April 9th, 2019 at 3:34:00-3:39:25. The final statute, a product of compromise on both sides, promised to limit any private right of action to claims for certain data security incidents resulting from a failure to comply with pre-existing standards of California law. See, Cal. Civ. Code §1798.81.5. Privacy attorneys and litigators were, however, quickly skeptical about whether the compromise language would be effective to preclude broader class action suits.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.