Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On April 2, 2020, the Court of Appeals, by a 4-3 margin, issued a lengthy and groundbreaking decision in Regina Metro Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal. The decision collectively decided four rent overcharge cases arising from Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 13 NY3d 270 (2009), wherein the Court of Appeals had ruled that luxury deregulation was unavailable in buildings receiving J-51 benefits. The landlords in Regina had deregulated various apartments based on advice from DHCR that luxury deregulation was not prohibited in such buildings. The question in Regina was how to compute base rents and rent overcharges in such cases.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
Guarantor Liability for Post-Window-Period Rent
By Cheryl Ginsburg
In a case of first impression, the Appellate Division, First Department recently addressed a split in the decisions of the lower courts as to the scope of the New York City Guaranty Law.
By New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
Foreclosure on Lien for Common Charges Not Dismissed
Condominium Entitled to Impose Reasonable Fee for Consent to Hallway Enclosure
By New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
Illegality Defense Raises Questions of Fact
Good Guy Guaranty Not Released
Exchange of Texts Does Not Constitute Settlement Agreement
Landlord’s Fraudulent Conveyance Claim Against Parking Lot Chain Avoids Dismissal
By New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
Boathouse Not an Impermissible Second Dwelling
Reduction In Size Did Not Alter Nonconforming Use Status
Local Ordinance Did Not Prohibit Short-Term Rentals