Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Michigan Appellate Court Ruling Provides Guidance On Restructuring for Cannabis Companies Image

Michigan Appellate Court Ruling Provides Guidance On Restructuring for Cannabis Companies

Marianna Wharry

A three-judge panel for the Michigan Court of Appeals held last month that receivers directing insolvent marijuana companies can reject burdensome leases and disregard contract provisions that could lead to widespread defaults.

Features

Bankruptcy Judges Struggle With Meaning of ‘Consensual Release’ Post-Purdue Image

Bankruptcy Judges Struggle With Meaning of ‘Consensual Release’ Post-Purdue

Seth H. Lieberman & Amanda M. Schaefer

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Purdue, which held that nonconsensual third-party releases are impermissible under the Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy judges across multiple jurisdictions have been grappling with what constitutes a “consensual” release. Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. 204 (2024). This article analyzes how different judges have defined “consent” and provides guidance on best practices for structuring third-party releases.

Features

Fourth Circuit: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction In Bankruptcy Depends On Statute, Not Debtor Solvency Image

Fourth Circuit: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction In Bankruptcy Depends On Statute, Not Debtor Solvency

Francis J. Lawall & Michael A. Sabino

The Fourth Circuit’s opinion focused on answering the core question presented — whether jurisdiction is determined by statute, rather than by a debtor’s financial condition. It reasoned that since the Constitution grants Article III power over “all cases arising under the laws of the United States” and the Bankruptcy Code is a law under the United States, the petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is clearly within the judicial ambit of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

Features

Ninth Circuit Rules that Decision Reimposing the Automatic Stay is Immediately Appealable Image

Ninth Circuit Rules that Decision Reimposing the Automatic Stay is Immediately Appealable

Daniel A. Lowenthal & Maxwell K. Weiss

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that a bankruptcy court’s decision to lift the automatic stay of pending litigation imposed by the Bankruptcy Code is a final, appealable order. But what if a bankruptcy court lifts the stay and later reimposes it? Is the latter order also immediately appealable, or is it considered interlocutory?

Features

The Expansive Equitable Powers of Bankruptcy Courts Under Section 510(C) Image

The Expansive Equitable Powers of Bankruptcy Courts Under Section 510(C)

Lawrence J. Kotler & Klara Bradbury

In a recent decision, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey subordinated a 502(h) claim to prevent the claimant from being paid in full prior to investors defrauded by the debtors’ pre-petition operation of a Ponzi scheme. In its decision, the court maintained that the equitable powers of bankruptcy courts were sufficiently broad to subordinate a claim on equitable grounds under Section 510(c) and that there is nothing in the Bankruptcy Code that prevents a court from so doing.

Features

United Arab Emirates Is Launching a Specialized Bankruptcy Court to Streamline Insolvency Cases Image

United Arab Emirates Is Launching a Specialized Bankruptcy Court to Streamline Insolvency Cases

Dario Sabaghi

The United Arab Emirates is launching a specialized federal bankruptcy court to streamline insolvency cases, a step that could increase investor confidence, reduce cross-emirate confusion, and create opportunities for legal and financial professionals.

Features

Eleventh Circuit: The Automatic Stay Can Be Lost Through a Debtor’s Misconduct Image

Eleventh Circuit: The Automatic Stay Can Be Lost Through a Debtor’s Misconduct

Francis J. Lawall & Amita Chohan

In a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit case, the court considered whether a bankruptcy court had the authority to retroactively annul the automatic stay under circumstances where the debtor affirmatively participated in an arbitration but subsequently argued that enforcement of the arbitration award against him should be subject to the automatic stay when he did not like the outcome.

Features

The Intersection of Bankruptcy and Personal Injury Claims Image

The Intersection of Bankruptcy and Personal Injury Claims

Meaghan Murphy

As personal injury and bankruptcy law increasingly intersect, attorneys must navigate a complex legal landscape. Nowhere is this more apparent than in cases involving financially distressed individuals with pending personal injury claims, or tort plaintiffs pursuing recovery against bankrupt defendants. This article highlights key questions and considerations attorneys should understand when navigating these types of cases.

Features

Mass Tort Cases Test Boundaries of Chapter 11 Bankruptcies Image

Mass Tort Cases Test Boundaries of Chapter 11 Bankruptcies

Christopher F. Graham & Frank J. Perch III & Morgan A. Goldstein & Lina Maria Diaz

Courts continue to grapple with issues impacting the rights of debtors, creditors and insurers in Chapter 11 cases filed by companies facing mass tort liabilities. This article summarizes key takeaways from significant cases such as Red River Talc and Boy Scouts of America (BSA).

Features

Inconvenient Interlocutory Bankruptcy Appeals — A Reply Image

Inconvenient Interlocutory Bankruptcy Appeals — A Reply

Michael L. Cook

A bankruptcy judge, his law clerk and two law students challenged this author’s opinion piece entitled “Inconvenient Bankruptcy Appeals” from the December 2024 issue of The Bankruptcy Strategist that district courts and Bankruptcy Appellate Panels have been rigidly limiting appellate review of interlocutory bankruptcy court orders as a matter of convenience. The critics argue instead that these courts consistently apply appropriate statutory and decisional standards when they decline appellate review, striving to “get it right.” A quick reply follows.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES