-
Entertainment Law & Finance
High Court’s View of ‘Full Costs’ in Copyright Litigation
Scott Graham
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court, led by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, held that the phrase “full costs” in §505 of the Copyright Act means all of the costs specifically enumerated in the general cost-shifting statutes, such as transcripts and fees for court-appointed experts and interpreters.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling on Copyright Registration
Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
The Supreme Court had granted cert in Fourth Estate to resolve a split in the federal circuit courts as to whether §411(a) of the Copyright Act could be read to allow commencement of an infringement action once a registration application filed with the Copyright Office is complete (the “application approach”) or, instead, only (subject to limited statutorily specified exceptions) upon issuance by the Copyright Office of the registration (the “registration approach”).
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The Supreme Court Finally Resolves An Old, Vexing Question: Does “Registration” Mean “Registration”? Answer: “Yes.”
James A. Trigg and Bethany R. Nelson
In Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split decades in the making by holding that a copyright is not “registered” within the meaning of the Copyright Act unless and until a registration certificate actually has issued.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Monopolizing the Disruptive
Arthur Beeman
The Federal Circuit’s Threat to Software Innovation in the Oracle v. GoogleDecisions<
The Federal Circuit decisions in the Oracle v. Google copyright case rattled Silicon Valley not simply because the decisions upended software developers’ understandings of copyright law, but also because the decisions do not comport with the disruptive ethos of the technology industry.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
IP News
Christine E. Weller
In celebration of International Women’s Day two years ago, State Street Global Advisors unveiled Fearless Girl at Bowling Green in the Financial District in Manhattan. Commissioned by State Street from the artist Kristen Visbal, the work has since become a part of the zeitgeist amidst global conversations about gender parity, diversity, and inclusion on a broader scale. Now, some two years later, Fearless Girl is raising additional intellectual property questions.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
25 Years After: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose and the State of Copyright Fair-Use Controversies
Stan Soocher
On March 7, 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court decided for the first time that a parody may be a copyright fair use. In the 25 years that followed, the High Court’s unanimous 9-0 ruling in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Inc., has been cited in more than 500 court decisions. But the Supreme Court’s pronouncement left questions and controversies in its wake.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Second Circuit Affirms ‘ReDigi’: No ‘Resale’ of Digital Music Files
Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently issued a long-awaited ruling in Capitol Records LLC v. ReDigi Inc., affirming summary judgment in favor of Capitol Records and its record label co-plaintiffs in a case that raised issues of first impression concerning first sale and fair use in the age of digital music distribution.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
UMG v. Grande Communications: Another Victory for the Music Industry in Its Battle to Hold ISPs Liable for Peer-to-Peer File Sharing
J. Alexander Lawrence
Since the advent of the Internet, the music industry has been in a pitched battle to combat online piracy. Initially, the industry focused on shutting down services that offered peer-to-peer or other similar platforms, such as Napster, Aimster and Grokster. For a time, the industry also focused on filing claims against individual infringers to dissuade others from engaging similar conduct. In recent years, the industry seems to have shifted focus toward Internet Service Providers.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
IP News
Howard Shire and Christine Weller
Kapoor v. National Rifle Association of America
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Perfecting Film Financiers’ Liens in Copyrights
Bruce Goldner
The law on how to perfect a lien in a copyright application is foggy at best. This article sketches out pitfalls of the current process for perfecting a lien on a copyright application, and potential steps that a financier may take to help perfect and protect a film investment.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Decision of Note: 6th Cir. Says No ‘Magic Words’ to ‘Elect’ Copyright Statutory Damages
Stan Soocher
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided that §504 of the U.S. Copyright Act doesn’t require any “magic words incantation” for a copyright infringement plaintiff to choose a statutory damages award, that “[t]he word ‘elect’ does not by itself require formal procedures.”
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
SCOTUS Hears Arguments on Copyright Registration Approvals
Scott Graham
While hearing January 2019 oral arguments before it, the U.S. Supreme Court sounded inclined to resolve a circuit courts’ split over copyright registration procedures against copyright holders.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Making Sense of YouTube’s Monetization Policies
Gwendolyn Seale
This article delves into YouTube’s policies for channel monetization, explores the different streams of revenue an artist or creator may be entitled to receive for their works, and offer suggestions to indie creators and more established creators, so they can meet these new thresholds.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
How Will the Music Modernization Act’s Mechanical Licensing Collective Work?
Chris Castle
This article focuses on managing change for clients affected by the MMA’s government-mandated mechanical licensing collective. In my view, far from putting songwriters on a trajectory away from the government regulation that has oppressed them for generations, the collective imposes an entirely new bureaucracy with potentially significant costs that are not readily apparent.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Abandonment Defense Stays in Copyright Suit on Filesharing
Zach Needles
Malibu Media LLC is by now well-known as a frequent filer of copyright infringement lawsuits nationwide against Web users alleged to have illegally downloaded and shared the company’s adult films. But a federal judge in Pennsylvania recently said it should be up to a jury to decide whether the company is entitled to stake a claim to those copyrights in the first place.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
DMCA Filmmakers Exemption Expanded
Scott Graham
Digital Millennium Copyright Act exemptions aren’t just for documentary filmmakers anymore. The U.S. Copyright Office and Library of Congress has broadened a DMCA exemption to now allow more filmmakers to circumvent anti-copying technology and rip short video clips for purposes of commentary and criticism.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Phil Everly’s Family Time-Barred From Claiming Co-Ownership of “Cathy’s Clown” Song Copyright With Brother Don
Newsworthiness and Public Interest Exceptions in Indiana’s Right-of-Publicity Statute Apply to Fantasy Sports
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Upcoming Events
Annual Entertainment, Sports & Media Law Institute
Copyright Year in Review
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
COUNSEL CONCERNS: Federal Judge Scolds Both Sides’ Lawyers In Labels/Spinrilla Copyright Dispute
R. Robin McDonald
A federal judge in Atlanta called out attorneys in a nationally watched copyright case for their role in an “an all-out, knock-down, drag-out fight between the ‘800-pound Gorilla’ of the recording industry in one corner of the room vs. ‘Spinrilla’, the self-proclaimed ‘800-pound Gorilla of free hiphop mixtapes’ in the other corner.”
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Usher Song Credit Suit Outcome; Suit Over Led Zeppelin Song Gets Retrial
Max Mitchell and Scott Graham
A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with. And the copyright case against Led Zeppelin by the band Spirit over "Stairway to Heaven" will return for an encore after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit called for a retrial.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The ‘New NAFTA’ and How It Will Affect Intellectual Property Law
Lawrence E. Ashery
The stage is set for the 24-year-old north American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to end and the U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA), which has implications for intellectual property, to take its place.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Friday the 13th Screenplay Author’s Copyright Termination Notice Found Valid
Infringement Suit over Justin Timberlake’s “Damn Girl” Allowed to Proceed
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
4 Takeways from EU Copyright Directive Vote
Dan Clark
In September, the European Parliament passed a new draft of the European Union (EU) Copyright Directive legislation championed by content creators and publishers, but decried by tech behemoths. The directive will have to go through more committee discussions and another parliamentary vote before it can become law, but this doesn’t mean the polarizing legislation isn’t already making in-house counsel nervous.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Issues in Using Bots to Send Takedown Notices
Ian Lopez
We asked University of Idaho College of Law Professor Annemarie Bridy, one of the forefront experts in both DMCA and automated notice sending, about out of control bots, DMCA takedowns’ potential threat to freedom of speech and more.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Fair Use, First Sale and Marilyn Monroe
Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
Recently, the Southern District of New York resolved a question that neither the Southern District nor the Second Circuit had ever squarely faced: Can the lawful owner of an art object create and post a photograph of that object in connection with the sale of the object through an online platform such as eBay, without the permission of the owner of copyright in the object?
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Decision of Note: Sound Recordings Remasters Don’t Get Federal Copyright Protection
Scott Graham
With an assist from Toucan Sam and Tony Bennett, owners of pre-1972 sound recordings no longer have to worry about losing their common law…
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Commentary: Amended Opinion No Cause for Alarm in ‘Blurred Lines’ Case Outcome
Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
Over the summer, a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a new trial motion and an order denying rehearing en banc in Williams v. Gaye. We now consider whether the final affirmance of the jury verdict in favor of Marvin Gaye’s heirs is likely to wreak havoc on musical creativity as some, including the dissent, have argued. For us, the short answer is no.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Patent Eligibility of User Interfaces
Lawrence H. Aaronson and James L. Korenchan
Advances in UI Design Can Provide Key Competitive Differentiation and Advantage, Which Makes Protecting Them Critically Important from a Business Perspective
Advances in UI design can also provide key competitive differentiation and advantage, helping to distinguish otherwise commoditized products and services such as computers, Web services, wearables, and appliances. Given this advantage, protecting advances in UI design can also be critically important from a business perspective.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Katy Perry Defendants Denied Summary Judgment in Copyright Infringement Action Over “Dark Horse”
Former Percussionist for The Roots Can Proceed with Lanham Act and Publicity Rights Claims Against the Band
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
“Registration” Means “Registration” … Or Does It?
James A. Trigg and Chris Bussert
Supreme Court Grants Cert to Resolve Circuit Split on Registration Prerequisite for Filing Suit under Copyright Act
Although the term “registration” as used in the Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act does not immediately appear to be ambiguous, courts have reached differing conclusions as to its meaning.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Jerry Lee Lewis Gets Extended Discovery Time in Management Litigation Against His Daughter
Three-Year Statute of Limitations Argument Doesn’t Bar Claims to Copyright Renewal Terms
Ticketmaster Prevails With “Striking Compatibility” Claim in Copyright Suit Over Ticket Bots
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Practical Impact of D.C. Circuit’s Ruling on Foreign Broadcasters and Copyright Liability
Scott D. Locke and Laura-Michelle Horgan
Broadcasters around the globe know that Americans want access to digital content and that they often ignore who provides it to them. For business reasons, tax reasons or to try to avoid liability under copyright law, many of these broadcasters intentionally do not set up operations in the United States. However, when these broadcasters transmit content for which they do not have authorization, they may be in violation of the copyright holder’s rights.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Arbitration Impact on Attorney Fees and Film Company Principal
Stan Soocher
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed a district court’s award of attorney fees to Sony Corp. under §505 of the Copyright Act for winning a ruling that a lawsuit over a Sony Music songwriting contest should be sent to arbitration.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Commentary: ‘Thin’ vs. ‘Broad’ Protection for Music Works
Dr. Dariush Adli
The hotly disputed legal issue between the majority and dissent in the recent, highly-publicized “Blurred Lines” decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concerned whether Marvin Gaye’s 1976 hit song “Got to Give it Up” was entitled to “broad” or “thin” copyright protection.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Commentary: Smaller Space for Innovation Leads to More Infringement Suits
Christopher J. Buccafusco
Pop musicians may be running out of creative space. And this problem is being exacerbated by the behaviors of what we might call the “legacy” interests — parties who own copyright interests in already-created songs but who won’t be making any new music.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Bit Parts
Stan Soocher
Brief Use of Graffiti Art in HBO’s Vinyl Show Found De Minimis
Chinese Film Company Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in Location Security Company’s Colorado Lawsuit
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Why Second Circuit Found No Fair Use in 'TVEyes' Case
Crystal Genteman and Chris Bussert
Only a small fraction of television news broadcasts are made available online. For a party to monitor and view all news coverage of an event, it would essentially have to watch and record all news broadcasts 24 hours a day, seven days a week. That's exactly what media-monitoring service TVEyes did. Fox News filed suit against TVEyes, claiming copyright infringement of 19 of its hour-long programs and alleging that TVEyes would divert Fox News’s viewership and its ability to license its news clips to third parties.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Copyright Law in the Age of Twitter
Shari Claire Lewis
A Recent Decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Involving Twitter May Have Significant Implications for Online Publications
The exponential growth of social media, and the inevitable conflicts that result, is leading to more and more litigation. In many instances, courts are being asked to apply laws crafted before the Internet era to these modern disputes.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
Walking the Fine Line of Fair Use: The Second Circuit’s Decision in Fox News v. TVEyes
Crystal Genteman and Chris Bussert
Only a small fraction of television news broadcasts are made available online. For a party to monitor and view all news coverage of an event, it would essentially have to watch and record all news broadcasts 24/7. That’s exactly what media-monitoring service TVEyes did. There was no dispute that TVEyes had copied Fox News’s content. Instead, the issue was whether TVEyes’s service constituted fair use.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The Sixth Circuit Creates a New Standard for Unmasking an Anonymous Copyright Infringer Post-Judgment
Richard Raysman and Elliot A. Magruder
On Nov. 28, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in Signature Mgmt. Team, LLC v. Doe. The case involved a John Doe defendant’s effort to remain anonymous even after having been adjudicated liable for copyright infringement of plaintiff’s business training manual.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
9th Cir. Appellate Arguments; FL Sup. Ct. Ruling on Pre-'72 Recordings
Scott Graham and Celia Ampel
Just a few days after the Florida Supreme Court ruled the state's common law doesn't provide pre-1972 sound recordings with rights to public performance royalties, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments on whether remasterings inject pre-1972 sound recordings with federal copyright protection.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
How Defendant's Prior Conduct Can Impact Copyright Cases
Nicholas J. Boyle and Richard A. Olderman
In the context of a copyright case, a defendant's prior bad acts and prior conduct are more useful to a plaintiff than is typical in civil litigation. In many instances, copyright infringement lawsuits are brought against defendants who have been sued before for infringement, or related misconduct, or who have been the subject of allegations or informal complaints, or who simply have experience in copyright matters.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Oral Appellate Arguments in 'Blurred Lines' Copyright Case
Scott Graham
Lawyers for Marvin Gaye's heirs and recording artists Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke were singing past each other in court in October. But it wasn't clear which side was making the most headway with the appellate court.
Read More ›
-
Internet Law & Strategy
EU Push to Filter 'Illegal' Content Raises Alarms in Silicon Valley
Ben Hancock
The European Commission (EU) is ramping up pressure on tech companies to more aggressively use automated filtering to scrub "illegal" content from the Internet, a move that is drawing criticism from some lawyers and free speech activists in Silicon Valley.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Children Book Versions of Classic Novels Not Fair Use
Vincent Peppe
In 2016, Frederik Colting and Melisa Medina planned to launch a series of 50 children's books, each book summarizing a great novel. They called their colorfully illustrated summaries KinderGuides. In January 2017, the owners of the copyrights to the novels filed a copyright infringement suit against Colting and Medina, resulting in a useful tale for lawyers who advise publishers on either side of such a dispute.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Books Rights Win For Daughter of Steinbeck's Widow
Ben Hancock
Susan Kohlmann, managing partner of Jenner & Block's New York office, has secured a shutout win for the stepdaughter of John Steinbeck in the latest installment of a long-running legal feud over book rights that has divided the late author's progeny.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Technology That Filters Movie Content Infringes Studios' Copyrights
Todd Cunningham
"Star Wars is still Star Wars, even without Princess Leia's bikini scene," said federal Circuit Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz in denying an appeal by the movie-filtering service VidAngel to lift an injunction that has kept its technology off the market since December 2016.
Read More ›
-
Entertainment Law & Finance
Copyright Royalty Board Gets E-Filing System
Rhys Dipshan
The Library of Congress' Copyright Royalty Board, the panel of three judges who set copyright royalty rates and settle related disputes, announced the launch of an electronic filing and case management system in an effort to streamline its manual and cumbersome case management processes.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The Uses of Prior Conduct in Copyright Cases
Nicholas J. Boyle and Richard A. Olderman
The Lessons of History
In the context of a copyright case, a defendant's prior bad acts and prior conduct are more useful to a plaintiff than is typical in civil litigation.
Read More ›
-
The Intellectual Property Strategist
The Impact of TC Heartland on Copyright Venue
J. Alexander Lawrence
The Supreme Court sparked a seismic shift in patent litigation recently when it upset the long-standing interpretation of 28 U.S.C. §1400(b), the special patent venue statute. TC Heartland held that for the purposes of patent venue, the meaning of "resides" in Section 1400(b) is not supplemented by the broad definition of "resides" in the general venue provision, 28 U.S.C. §1391.
Read More ›
