Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Whether certain conduct is a crime depends on more than legislatures, judges, and juries. When prosecutors decide whether, whom, and what to charge, the policies underlying their decisions create operative standards of conduct. So, too, do those of agencies administering regulatory programs backed by criminal sanctions. But what about the private sector? Sensible standards of conduct articulated by trade associations can and should play a substantial role in drawing the line between acceptable business practices and bad conduct that can be subject to criminal sanctions.
A good example is the recent development of a Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers under the Medicare/ Medicaid anti-kickback statute, 42 U.S.C. ' 1320a-7b(b)(1)-(2), by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services. In general, the anti-kickback statute prohibits the payment of any “remuneration” to a provider of health care to influence the provider's selection of any goods or services to be used in health-care covered by Medicare, Medicaid or another federal health care program. The statute has exceptions, 42 U.S.C. ' 1320a-7b(b)(3); and several safe harbors for specific kinds of arrangements have been created by regulation, 42 C.F.R. ' 1001.952. Nevertheless, there remains a large gray area, which makes it hard to know what is prohibited in many kinds of circumstances.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.