Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Courthouse Steps

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 25, 2003

CASE CAPTION: Kittie Inc., Mercedes Sherida Lander, Morgan Lee Lander and Garth Richardson v. Sheridan Square Entertainment LLC d/b/a Artemis Records; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York # 03-21-2195.

CAUSES OF ACTION: Various breaches of contract, including the contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing.

COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: Kittie is a young female rock band from Ontario, Canada, whose debut album Spit was released on the Artemis label ' with which Kittie signed an exclusive recording agreement ' to critical acclaim and was certified gold. The band followed up this success with the release of three additional records and a video for Artemis. The Landers are members of Kittie. Richardson is the band's producer. Kittie retained the accounting firm of McGladrey & Pullen LLP to conduct an audit on of the record company's accounting books from June 1999 through June 2002. During the examination, McGladrey & Pullen uncovered numerous accounting discrepancies and an underpayment to the plaintiffs of more than $900,000 in royalties owed and breaches of the recording agreement by Artemis. These included use of an improper base price in calculating royalties, improper foreign royalty rate reductions, overcharges with respect to video production costs, miscalculations regarding free goods, excess reserves, double recoupment of producer and mixer advances, improper expense charges and foreign taxes improperly withheld.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Warehouse Liability: Know Before You Stow! Image

As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?