Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

TVT vs. Def Jam Provides Tips On Evidence Use

By Stan Soocher
August 25, 2003

On March 21, a Manhattan federal jury ruled that the Island Def Jam Music Group (IDJ) committed breach of contract, copyright infringement and fraud over TVT Records plans to release an album by hip-hop producer Irv Gotti featuring Ja Rule and his group Cash Murda Click (CMC). (TVT alleged that IDJ wrongfully prevented Gotti from delivering a CMC album for a November 2002 release date. The district judge bifurcated the trial into separate liability and damages phases.) In addition, the judge denied TVT's motion to dismiss IDJ's counterclaims for tortious interference with contractual relations. TVT Records v. The Island Def Jam Music Group, 02-6644. The district court's decision'and related March 4 and March 7 rulings issued just before the trial began ' offered valuable tips on what evidence may be introduced in litigation between record companies over the services of an artist. Among the evidentiary rulings:

A letter delivered by IDJ to TVT on the eve of trial giving consent for Gotti and Ja Rule to deliver a CMC album to TVT was precluded from trial. Otherwise, the court noted it 'would effectively remove from the jury a threshold issue it is here being charged to determine: whether the parties' interactions culminating in the Side Letter Agreement [between IDJ and TVT for the services of Gotti and Ja Rule] formed a binding contract in the first place and, if so, whether that contract was breached by IDJ in [a repudiation letter from] August 2002.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.