Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided that the unlicensed streaming on the Internet of two-minute clips from Walt Disney films didn't constitute fair use. Video Pipeline Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment Inc., 02-2497.
Video Pipeline had filed for a declaratory judgment. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Disney, including on its copyright infringement counterclaim. The Third Circuit noted that neither side had informed the district court that Video Pipeline was appealing an earlier entry of a preliminary injunction. (“By continuing to litigate the case in the District Court after the appeal was taken and by failing to inform either Court of the ongoing actions of the other, counsel risked a needless waste of judicial resources as well as the resources of their clients,” the appeals court complained.)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.