Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Justice Anthony J. Falanga of the Supreme Court, Nassau County has added another twist to the case law fixing dates for the valuation of marital property when a previous action for divorce is abandoned. The case, Tuccillo v. Tuccillo, 2003 NY Slip Op 51151U, 2003 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 999, (Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., 8/4/03) (Falanga, J.), involves a wife's motion for omnibus pendente lite relief and the husband's cross motion for an order determining the appropriate valuation date of the marital property to be Dec. 28, 1999 (the date the first divorce application was made) for purposes of equitable distribution. The husband also moved for a determination that the date of termination of the acquisition of marital property be Dec. 28, 1999. At the hearing's conclusion, the court, finding that the husband had overreached in convincing his wife to sign a settlement agreement unfavorable to her, refused to apply the general rule in the Second Department that sets the date for valuation of marital assets at the commencement of the first action if the parties fail to reconcile in the interim.
The Tucillos were married Nov. 21, 1986. They have four children between the ages of 11 and 16. The wife, a high-school graduate, had at her husband's request been unemployed for 19 years, serving as homemaker and primary caregiver to the children. This, she averred, freed her husband to pursue his business ventures, which at the time of this action included his sole ownership of the following businesses: Anchor Foods, Anchor Fish of Westbury and Anchor Fish Distributors, Ltd., businesses he acquired in 1981; Diversified Processors Inc., acquired in 1995-1996; 32 Urban Corporation acquired in 1991; Prince of the Sea, Ltd., acquired in 1989; Internet Seaford, acquired in 1995; and Myfour Realty Inc., acquired in 1997.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.