Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Courts in Texas and New York became embroiled in an international child custody squabble in which New York's Appellate Division, Third Department, awarded sole custody to the mother, rejecting the lower court, the law guardian, the wishes of the children and a prior custody agreement. An appellate panel in Albany, NY, overturned a Family Court judge in a case in which a Muslim man took his children to Saudi Arabia and obtained an ex parte custody order from an Islamic court.
Matter of Ahmad v. Naviwala, 92611, involves a devout Muslim couple with four children. Samia N. Ahmad and Iqbal M. Naviwala were married in 1986 and divorced in 1999. Mrs. Ahmad received an order of sole custody. Under the agreement, the noncustodial parent would receive 3 months of continuous visitation annually. However, after consulting Islamic law scholars, the couple agreed that sole custody would be transferred to Mr. Naviwala in 2000. In June 2000, before Mr. Naviwala was given sole custody, he brought the children to Saudi Arabia, where he now lives, for his 3-month visitation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.