Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The House Wants to Keep Its Blackberrys
In a letter to the attorneys in NTP v. Research In Motion Ltd., James Eagen, the chief administrator of the House of Representatives, asked the parties to settle their differences in a way that would allow the BlackBerry wireless devices at issue to continue operating. The letter was prompted by the November 21, 2002 jury verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia wherein Research In Motion was found to infringe five of NTP's patents and ordered to pay $23 million in damages. The patents at issue cover the use of radio frequencies in wirelessly redirecting corporate e-mail. Research In Motion, which makes the popular BlackBerry devices, indicated that it will appeal the jury's decision.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.