Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois announced in mid-September that his state was considering buying drugs from Canada for its employees and citizens, the debate over cross-border drug purchases via the Internet and by other means, got even hotter than it was before. The pharmaceutical industry is fighting a battle similar in scope to the music industry's Internet copyright infringement war, but because no suits have been brought against 80-year-old diabetics buying insulin from pharmacies in Montreal, national debate on the issue of the purchase of foreign drugs has gotten less press of late than the debate over music piracy. Still, for the millions of purchasers of pharmaceutical products and the companies that manufacture and sell them, few subjects are quite as contentious or consequential.
Foreign companies are offering consumers in the United States both Internet and mail-order access to pharmaceutical products, which are often cheaper than U.S. drugs because of government subsidies and price controls. Canadian drugs, for example, are on average 67% less expensive than those sold in the United States. Americans can also easily travel over the Canadian and Mexican borders to buy their pharmaceutical supplies in person, even taking bus trips organized specifically for the drug purchaser. And although Canada is not the only country that provides Americans with access to foreign drugs, Canadian drug companies seem to be the biggest threat to American pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers, largely because of their close proximity to the United States and the trust most Americans have in the safety of Canadian products.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.