Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As used in this article, “refranchising” means the sale of company-operated units to purchasers who become franchisees operating the units as franchise stores. Frequently the franchisees will also purchase the right/obligation to develop additional stores pursuant to a development agreement, thus increasing the upfront revenue to the seller or franchisor and providing for the construction of new units at the expense of the new franchisee. The sale may also involve the obligation of the purchaser to remodel the purchased units, once again allowing the seller or franchisor to achieve an overall upgrading of its units using the cash of the buyer, rather than its own resources. Ideally, the royalty revenue from the newly franchised units will replace the cash flow and profits lost from ceasing to operate the units as company stores, while the purchaser's or franchisee's new development will ultimately increase revenues. Sales proceeds and exclusive territory fees and development fees received at closing can be used to increase current earnings, reduce debt, and free up lines of credit for additional company store development in other markets.
There are several things that a franchisor can do in structuring its refranchising program to reduce the likelihood of disputes and litigation. This article discusses the presale market identification and internal due diligence and initial marketing process that culminates in the execution of a letter of intent (“LOI”).
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.