Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As part of estate and tax planning, individuals can place their assets in a trust. These include joint assets acquired during a marriage, pre-marital assets, or marital assets in one party's name. There are personal trusts for designated purposes, for example a trust imposed over real estate, such as a Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT). A married couple could use a QPRT to place a jointly owned home in a trust and name the wife as the beneficiary and the child as a contingent beneficiary. Other trusts can serve as mechanisms for sheltering assets from taxation or can serve as a way to exclude assets from an estate or to protect assets. In a divorce case where a trust exists, it is possible to terminate the trust, with the agreement of all the parties, to utilize the proceeds to meet the needs of the parties in effectuating equitable distribution. Bear in mind that the termination of a trust can only be achieved by agreement and therefore such a goal cannot be achieved in a litigated matter. As part of a divorce settlement, certain types of trusts can be created for funding education expenses or covering medical expenses. These trusts would provide a mechanism for meeting support obligations.
During the negotiations in a matrimonial case, it may be beneficial to your client to utilize the asset or assets that were placed in a trust as part of the final equitable distribution plan. For example, if a husband owns a business and owes money to the wife as and for equitable distribution of her interest in the business, and a QPRT was created for the house, the value of the house in a QPRT may be able to be used to satisfy the spouse's equitable distribution claim. If the trust is terminated, the asset could be turned over to the wife, rather than utilizing notes, security and a payment plan to satisfy the equitable distribution obligation. The husband would then be able to receive the business outright without having it encumbered to satisfy his equitable distribution obligation to his wife.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.