Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a troubled business climate, a scenario all too often occurs wherein a once steady and reliable customer becomes delinquent in payment and eventually files for bankruptcy protection. In this common situation, your client's good customer becomes a debtor and your client becomes one of many creditors jockeying to recover a small portion of its investment. To make matters worse, your client receives a letter from the debtor or court appointed trustee demanding repayment of a pre-petition preferential payment pursuant to section 547(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code).
Whenever a creditor receives a benefit from a debtor shortly before the debtor files for bankruptcy, whether the payment of money or the granting of additional security, a preferential transfer may occur. Significantly, the bankruptcy law entitles a debtor's estate to recover preferential transfers, including payments on account of antecedent debts made during the 90-day period prior to the bankruptcy petition. In other words, section 547(b) of the Code permits a trustee to avoid pre-bankruptcy transfers as “preferences.” In order for a preferential transfer to exist, a trustee of a debtor's estate must establish seven elements: 1) a transfer, 2) of an interest of the debtor in property, 3) to or for the benefit of a creditor, 4) for or on account of an antecedent debt, 5) made while the debtor was insolvent, 6) made within 90 days before bankruptcy, 7) the effect of which is to give the creditor more than it would receive in the bankruptcy proceeding. Unless the trustee proves each and every element, a transfer is not avoidable as a preference under 547(b). Conversely, a trustee's establishment of all of the elements of a preferential transfer by a preponderance of the evidence, results in the recoverability of the payment for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.