Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Overturning a 19-year-old precedent, the Court of Appeals of New York held on April 1 that a woman may recover damages for emotional distress for medical malpractice that causes a miscarriage or stillbirth, even if she personally suffers no physical injury. Broadnax v. Gonzalez (No. 30) and Fahey v. Canino (No. 31), 2004 NY LEXIS 603 (4/1/04). In a 6-1 opinion, the court abandoned the rule it adopted in Tebbutt v. Virostek, 65 NY2d 931 (1985), which set a precedent that a mother could recover for emotional injuries related to the stillbirth of her child only if she suffered an independent physical injury due to the negligence of the attending physician.
In an opinion by Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt, the Court of Appeals ruled that “even in the absence of an independent injury, medical malpractice resulting in miscarriage or stillbirth should be construed as a violation of a duty of care to the expectant mother, entitling her to damages for emotional distress.” The court said its decision has no impact on a 1969 ruling that bars wrongful death actions under similar circumstances. Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 NY2d 478
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.