Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Reconsideration Motion Denied in Jay-Z Recording Suit
A Manhattan federal district court denied a defense motion for reconsideration of a ruling over alleged rights in the Jay-Z recording “Izzo (H.O.V.A.).” Ulloa v. Universal Music and Video Distribution Corp., 01-9583. Plaintiff Demme Ulloa had alleged copyright infringement and unjust enrichment based on a vocal phrase she contributed to the recording while a visitor at a studio session. Reconfirming its earlier denial of summary judgment for the defendants on those claims, the district court noted that whether the melody occurred in prior art wasn't relevant to the originality of Ulloa's vocal phrase because the defendants “do not contend that Plaintiff copied the Vocal Phrase from those prior works.” The district court also noted in its latest ruling that Ulloa's unjust enrichment claim wasn't preempted at this point by copyright law because she would be able to proceed with the claim if “Defendants prevail at trial in establishing that the Vocal Phrase was either created as a work for hire (and thus Plaintiff has no copyright in the work) or licensed to Defendants.”
Implied Contract Claim Can Continue
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.