Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Dangers Of e-Recruiting

By Marie Flores
May 01, 2004

The efficiency, ease and convenience of online recruiting and interviewing have made for instant hiring success among companies in all industries employing this effective, low-cost, easy-to-use, flexible staffing method.

And it's easy to see why online recruiting has quickly won converts and steadfast adherents. Besides its flexibility and lower cost than traditional hiring tactics, such as advertising, employers can:

  • Seek employees 24 hours a day, every day;
  • Reduce, to some extent, travel costs, with prospective employees applying for work from the privacy of their homes;
  • Maximize scales of economy by lowering recruitment costs and plumbing the capabilities of their corporate Web sites;
  • Quickly remove filled positions;
  • Quickly post new positions;
  • Receive resumes and applications from potential applicants faster than ever;
  • Offer complete job descriptions and allow quicker, more efficient and inexpensive communication between recruiters and applicants; and
  • Provide more services, such as non-English language employment postings, application forms and company information directly to potential applicants, faster and at lower cost than they have prior to the proliferation of Internet access, and the lowering of Internet service subscription prices.

e-Recruiting is also providing e-commerce ventures with more revenue streams via hosting, e-mail and total recruiting services ' including training and staff development.

Statistics show that purveyors of the job market are riding the wave of Web recruitment possibilities on their way to success. According to a 2003 study, 94% of the world's largest organizations have “corporate Careers Web sites.” See Rules and Regulations, 69 Fed. Reg. 43, 10152, 10155 (March 4, 2004), GPO Access available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-4090.htm.

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.