Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Thinking Outside The Booth
When creating a marketing plan, the topic of exhibiting at trade shows invariably comes up. If your firm determines that a trade show will be a beneficial part of the marketing mix, it must be seamlessly integrated into the firm's marketing and sales plan rather than it being treated as an isolated event. This is not to say that the big show cannot be the crowning event of the year or as a kick-off for new promotions. Make the trade show part of a Master Plan.
Go With a Purpose
The purpose of exhibiting at a trade show is much more than setting up a temporary storefront to hawk your goods and services to the masses. In reality, there just isn't enough time at a trade show to really exploit all of the possible opportunities. A trade show compresses numerous marketing and sales events into a span of two or three intense days. In the short lifespan of a show, you have a chance to get in some quality networking, new client introduction meetings, client appreciation events, speaking engagements as a seminar presenter, educational events as an attendee and a little competitive spying. All of this in an environment ripe for some world class schmoozing. The negative side of all this is that it requires a lot of time and money, so getting the best bang for the buck is dependent on good planning and diligent follow-through. Do not make the mistake of focusing on the “Show” as the only part of your firm's overall marketing program, as there is much to do before and after the actual show.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.