Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Thirteen gay and lesbian couples brought suit in the state Supreme Court in Albany on April 7, alleging their state constitutional rights to equal protection, privacy and due process were violated when they were recently denied marriage licenses. The couples were joined in their suit by the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union. One of the complainants is Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, brother of television and movie personality Rosie O'Donnell, who was, herself, recently married to her lesbian partner in California.
The suit, filed against the state Department of Health, claims that the couples' wedding plans were thwarted when criminal charges were brought against Mayor Jason West of New Paltz for performing same-sex marriages. West had planned to continue performing the marriages despite the couples' lack of marriage licenses, but was enjoined from doing so.
This is the third lawsuit brought against the state of New York since Mayor West moved the issue onto the state's front burner by performing his first same-sex marriage in February. The first such suit was brought by the Lambda Society on behalf of five couples who were denied marriage licenses in New York City. The second suit was filed by 10 Nyack couples (including the town's mayor and his partner) against the town clerk of Orangetown for refusing to issue licenses to the couples. With this most recent filing, there are lawsuits concerning gay marriage issues pending in three of the state's four judicial departments.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.