Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cigar Franchisor Settles with FTC
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it settled litigation with Grover Stewart, senior operations manager, Nationwide Premium Cigar Distributors Corp. (Hallandale, FL), for failing to provide presale disclosures to prospective purchasers of their cigar and humidor business opportunities. The settlement bans Stewart for 3 years from selling franchises and business ventures, requires him to post a $100,000 bond before selling business opportunities in the future, and bans him from selling his customer lists. Stewart also is banned from violating the Franchise Rule and from making false and misleading representations in connection with the sale of business opportunities. He made no admission of wrongdoing.
The settlement was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, and signed on March 29, 2004.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?