Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most experienced and highly respected matrimonial lawyers will agree that the single most important ingredient to bring any case to a successful conclusion is credibility. But, simple as it sounds, credibility is not achieved overnight. For a lawyer, it takes years of honest candor to develop. For a client, it is simply being fair and honest. It is what makes a weak case strong, and the lack of it makes a strong case weak.
Among the values of credibility is the ability to bring a case to a satisfactory conclusion, whether by settlement or by trial. Credibility is a two-way street between client and attorney. The client must have respect for the attorney's advice; and the attorney must recognize the truthfulness and good faith of the client.
In settlement negotiations, the credibility of opposing counsel and his/her client is an issue: Distrust of positions taken by an adversary is counterproductive. An adverse party who is not believed creates obstacles to the resolution of the issues. In court, the case is won or lost based upon the credibility of one side or the other. A court or jury makes findings of fact based upon the more credible evidence and witnesses. The results of the case are based upon the more credible case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.