Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Encouraged by recent amendments to the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines (see article on p. 3), federal prosecutors are pressuring target companies to turn on their employees in ways that were unthinkable a few years ago. The measures being extracted as elements of “cooperation” necessary to reduce corporate charges and/or fines and other penalties or, possibly, to avoid prosecution altogether include: 1) waiving the company's attorney-client privilege and work-product protection and giving prosecutors memoranda and notes of interviews with employees; 2) denying employees advancement of attorneys' fees unless they cooperate in a manner that satisfies prosecutors (ie, submit to interviews intended to lock in their version of events, provide leads to further evidence against themselves and others, and reveal any potential defenses they might assert at trial); 3) at the prosecutors' request, removing employees from their jobs and sources of income, with the consequence that it becomes impossible or more difficult for them to pay for their own counsel; and 4) either denying employees access to corporate documents produced to prosecutors or granting only limited access and reporting to prosecutors on the documents provided to employees. Thus, target companies have become active extensions of the government for purposes of coercing their employees into jeopardizing any opportunity they have to mount a successful defense against possible criminal charges.
Corporate fraud is a serious national problem. The measures just described will help prosecutors build – and win – cases against corporate employees. Still, they are bad public policy because they are unfair. They also will tend to erode somewhat the legitimacy of the federal criminal process and the loyalty of employees to their corporate employers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.