Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Federal Prosecutors Pressuring Companies

By Richard M. Cooper
July 29, 2004

Encouraged by recent amendments to the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines (see article on p. 3), federal prosecutors are pressuring target companies to turn on their employees in ways that were unthinkable a few years ago. The measures being extracted as elements of “cooperation” necessary to reduce corporate charges and/or fines and other penalties or, possibly, to avoid prosecution altogether include: 1) waiving the company's attorney-client privilege and work-product protection and giving prosecutors memoranda and notes of interviews with employees; 2) denying employees advancement of attorneys' fees unless they cooperate in a manner that satisfies prosecutors (ie, submit to interviews intended to lock in their version of events, provide leads to further evidence against themselves and others, and reveal any potential defenses they might assert at trial); 3) at the prosecutors' request, removing employees from their jobs and sources of income, with the consequence that it becomes impossible or more difficult for them to pay for their own counsel; and 4) either denying employees access to corporate documents produced to prosecutors or granting only limited access and reporting to prosecutors on the documents provided to employees. Thus, target companies have become active extensions of the government for purposes of coercing their employees into jeopardizing any opportunity they have to mount a successful defense against possible criminal charges.

Corporate fraud is a serious national problem. The measures just described will help prosecutors build – and win – cases against corporate employees. Still, they are bad public policy because they are unfair. They also will tend to erode somewhat the legitimacy of the federal criminal process and the loyalty of employees to their corporate employers.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.