Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Federal Prosecutors Pressuring Companies

By Richard M. Cooper

Encouraged by recent amendments to the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines (see article on p. 3), federal prosecutors are pressuring target companies to turn on their employees in ways that were unthinkable a few years ago. The measures being extracted as elements of “cooperation” necessary to reduce corporate charges and/or fines and other penalties or, possibly, to avoid prosecution altogether include: 1) waiving the company's attorney-client privilege and work-product protection and giving prosecutors memoranda and notes of interviews with employees; 2) denying employees advancement of attorneys' fees unless they cooperate in a manner that satisfies prosecutors (ie, submit to interviews intended to lock in their version of events, provide leads to further evidence against themselves and others, and reveal any potential defenses they might assert at trial); 3) at the prosecutors' request, removing employees from their jobs and sources of income, with the consequence that it becomes impossible or more difficult for them to pay for their own counsel; and 4) either denying employees access to corporate documents produced to prosecutors or granting only limited access and reporting to prosecutors on the documents provided to employees. Thus, target companies have become active extensions of the government for purposes of coercing their employees into jeopardizing any opportunity they have to mount a successful defense against possible criminal charges.

Corporate fraud is a serious national problem. The measures just described will help prosecutors build – and win – cases against corporate employees. Still, they are bad public policy because they are unfair. They also will tend to erode somewhat the legitimacy of the federal criminal process and the loyalty of employees to their corporate employers.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.