Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Air quality standards are frequently not satisfactorily addressed in leases, if they are addressed at all. Most sophisticated office leases will require a landlord to provide certain temperature and humidity levels during specified times. A typical clause provides that the landlord will provide HVAC service from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and perhaps from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Sometimes the actual dry and wet bulb temperature and humidity levels will be specified, and in other instances the lease will simply provide that temperature and humidity levels will be in accordance with first-class standards. These provisions, however, do not address air quality, including cooking odors or exhaust fumes which may infiltrate the building's air system and end up in a tenant's space.
A lease may have boilerplate provisions requiring the landlord to comply with applicable laws, but such provisions do not necessarily require the landlord to provide its tenant with odor-free space. The savvy tenant will require the landlord to provide, at a minimum, that the air quality in the tenant's space will be in accordance with standards for first-class office buildings and further require the landlord to take corrective actions at its expense in the event that the air quality does not match such standards. It is particularly important for lower-floor tenants of urban properties to insert provisions with respect to fumes, especially cooking odors. In order to ensure that the landlord does not correct air quality problems at the tenant's expense, the expense pass-through provisions of the lease should specifically exclude capital expenditures. This exclusion will provide the landlord with an incentive to hold other tenants or the owners of adjoining properties accountable if their activities are the cause of the aggrieved tenant's air quality problems.
Air quality standards are frequently not satisfactorily addressed in leases, if they are addressed at all. Most sophisticated office leases will require a landlord to provide certain temperature and humidity levels during specified times. A typical clause provides that the landlord will provide HVAC service from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and perhaps from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Sometimes the actual dry and wet bulb temperature and humidity levels will be specified, and in other instances the lease will simply provide that temperature and humidity levels will be in accordance with first-class standards. These provisions, however, do not address air quality, including cooking odors or exhaust fumes which may infiltrate the building's air system and end up in a tenant's space.
A lease may have boilerplate provisions requiring the landlord to comply with applicable laws, but such provisions do not necessarily require the landlord to provide its tenant with odor-free space. The savvy tenant will require the landlord to provide, at a minimum, that the air quality in the tenant's space will be in accordance with standards for first-class office buildings and further require the landlord to take corrective actions at its expense in the event that the air quality does not match such standards. It is particularly important for lower-floor tenants of urban properties to insert provisions with respect to fumes, especially cooking odors. In order to ensure that the landlord does not correct air quality problems at the tenant's expense, the expense pass-through provisions of the lease should specifically exclude capital expenditures. This exclusion will provide the landlord with an incentive to hold other tenants or the owners of adjoining properties accountable if their activities are the cause of the aggrieved tenant's air quality problems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.