Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On July 23, 2004, the long-awaited proposed revisions to the Americans With Disabilities Act's (ADA) physical accessibility guidelines, the “ADAAG,” were published in the Federal Register. Though the changes will take effect on Sept. 21, 2004, they will not be enforceable until adopted in their final form by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Since the proposed ADAAG have been completely reformatted to conform more closely to existing uniform accessibility standards and certain uniform building codes, it will be necessary to compare the current and proposed ADAAG specifications to understand the full scope of the changes. The proposed guidelines involve more than 230 pages of text and commentary, and it is not yet known what impact these changes will have on construction activities or how these guidelines will force landlords to modify existing leases to shift some of the responsibility of these new guidelines to tenants.
Title III of the ADA requires that “public accommodations” and “commercial enterprises” must be accessible to disabled persons. The current ADAAG sets forth physical specifications to ensure that new construction and alterations to public accommodations and commercial enterprises provide access to the disabled public. For properties constructed prior to the enactment of the ADA that are not being altered, architectural barriers to accessibility must be removed to the extent it is “readily achievable,” ie, easily accomplishable and able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense. When it is not “readily achievable,” Title III of the ADA does not require the barriers to be removed even though the disabled public may not be able to access public spaces. However, when barriers to accessibility are removed, the alterations must conform to the ADAAG's specifications. It is not anticipated that the new guidelines will alter the ADA's regulations or its requirements regarding the removal of architectural barriers, although the revised ADAAG could impose new requirements on exactly what constitutes the suitable removal of a barrier.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.