Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
NJ Clarifies Rule on Apportionment of Defense Costs
When an insurer is called upon to reimburse a policyholder for defense costs, New Jersey law limits the insurer's obligation to reimbursing only the costs of defending covered claims. If both covered and non-covered claims are involved, the parties and the court must apportion the total costs between those that can be reimbursed and those that cannot. New Jersey courts were vague about how such an apportionment must be performed. A panel of the Appellate Division, however, recently made an effort to establish a usable test for the apportionment of defense costs.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.