Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

9th Circuit's Acceptance of 'Melodic Reduction' May Change Music Infringement Litigation

By Michael T. Mervis and Robyn S. Crosson

In recent years, courts have frequently dismissed music copyright infringement cases at the summary judgment stage, finding that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning the claimed similarity between the allegedly infringed and infringing songs. See, eg, Onofrio v. Reznor, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2835 (9th Cir. 2000); Moore v. Columbia Pictures Indus. Inc., 972 F.2d 939 (8th Cir. 1992); Cottrill v. Spears, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8823 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Toliver v. Sony Music Entertainment Inc., 149 F. Supp. 2d 909 (D. Ak. 2001).

In a number of cases, the court found the opinion of similarity offered by the plaintiff's expert musicologist ' usually a music professor or otherwise credentialed music scholar ' to be legally deficient or otherwise irrelevant to the applicable legal standards. However, a decision earlier this year from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Swirsky v. Carey, 376 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2004), amended by 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17969 (9th Cir. 2004), appears to have expanded the net of music copyright infringement cases that may survive summary judgment. In Swirsky, the court found that a type of expert musicological analysis, commonly called “melodic reduction,” can raise a triable issue of fact concerning similarity. This article will explain melodic reduction and the problems that the Swirsky decision and melodic reduction may pose for defendants in music copyright infringement cases.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."