In recent years, courts have frequently dismissed music copyright infringement cases at the summary judgment stage, finding that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning the claimed similarity between the allegedly infringed and infringing songs.
9th Circuit's Acceptance of 'Melodic Reduction' May Change Music Infringement Litigation
In recent years, courts have frequently dismissed music copyright infringement cases at the summary judgment stage, finding that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning the claimed similarity between the allegedly infringed and infringing songs. In a number of cases, the court found the opinion of similarity offered by the plaintiff's expert musicologist ' usually a music professor or otherwise credentialed music scholar ' to be legally deficient or otherwise irrelevant to the applicable legal standards. <br>However, a decision earlier this year from Ninth Circuit appears to have expanded the net of music copyright infringement cases that may survive summary judgment. In <i>Swirsky v. Carey</i>, the court found that a type of expert musicological analysis, commonly called "melodic reduction," can raise a triable issue of fact concerning similarity. This article will explain melodic reduction and the problems that the <i>Swirsky</i> decision and melodic reduction may pose for defendants in music copyright infringement cases.
By
Michael T. MervisRobyn S. CrossonThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
