Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At some point nearly all law firms consider using trial consulting services, some to test out in-court techniques before a mock jury, others to meet the challenges of representing high-profile litigants in well-publicized cases, and still others to meet the burdensome technology demands that today's litigation can present.
As attorneys weigh the pros and cons of whether to use these services, the overall trial consulting needs of law firms are changing. In the first half of this year, our company's trial consulting division has seen that attorneys and law firms seem to be making greater use of trial consulting services, with a notable increase in the number of requests from last year.
There are several types of cases that lend themselves to use of trial consulting services, especially litigation involving class action, construction defect, patent and breach of contract. It is important to note that each trial is different, with its own dynamic and subject to changes based on rulings as the case proceeds.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.