The current climate of earnest review of practices in the matrimonial field makes a revamping of the state's law guardian practice exquisitely timely. Some swear by the use of law guardians, while others may swear at it.
A Call for Uniformity in Law Guardian Practice
The current climate of earnest review of practices in the matrimonial field makes a revamping of the state's law guardian practice exquisitely timely. Some swear by the use of law guardians, while others may swear at it. The disparity in views can be attributed to the disparity in practices, from department to department, county to county, court to court, and case to case. There is disparity in the training of law guardians, and most unjustly, a disparity based on the parties' finances and ability to pay. To put it simply, any inconsistency in how 9-year-old Michael Byrne's lawyer in Buffalo works from how Mikhl Bernstein's lawyer in Brooklyn operates is an inconsistency waiting to be rectified, and some proposals therefore are offered herein.
This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.






