Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Outsourced Records Center Creates New Space/Time Paradigm
When Haight Brown & Bonesteel, a 90-attorney law firm in California, decided to relocate in 2001, we were faced with a serious records management issue: our new records center would only be one-third the size of our current space. Knowing that significant changes were in order, we called in an outside vendor to conduct a needs assessment and offer recommendations. The initial project scope included the installation of a records management application, creation of protocol standards, an implementation plan, the establishment of best practices and a play by play directive for the imminent records center move. Outsourcing the day-to-day center operations to a vendor was not the original goal, but here's what happened:
The Assessment
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.