Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

The Terminix Case: Causation in Mass Tort Litigation

On Aug. 27, 2004, the Fifth Circuit Court of Davidson County in Nashville, TN entered final judgment for Terminix International in a nine-plaintiff toxic-tort personal injury lawsuit. <i>Ballentine v. Terminix Int'l Co.,</i> No. 98C-836 (Aug. 27, 2004 Order). The case demonstrates the use of a challenge to the admissibility of plaintiffs' causation evidence to dismantle a multi-plaintiff or mini-mass tort claim from a single toxic exposure, and it illustrates the importance to both sides of getting the scientific evidence right from the outset. The approach to a mini-mass tort involving injuries from a single exposure need be no different from that used in a single plaintiff's claim.

28 minute read November 30, 2004 at 08:18 AM
By
Kirby Griffis
The Terminix Case: Causation in Mass Tort Litigation

On Aug. 27, 2004, the Fifth Circuit Court of Davidson County in Nashville, TN entered final judgment for Terminix International in a nine-plaintiff toxic-tort personal injury lawsuit. Ballentine v. Terminix Int'l Co., No. 98C-836 (Aug. 27, 2004 Order).

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Adverse Possessor Provided Insufficient Evidence to Support TackingTown’s Installation of Guardrails Did Not Constitute a TakingMortgagee Entitled to Deficiency JudgmentLandowner Adequately Alleged Trespass During Renovation

August 13, 2026

Agentic AI introduces risks that are novel and complex, but the most effective response is a familiar one. Zero Trust answers the problem of when an AI agent misfires on its own by constraining what an agent can do rather than betting on how it will behave.

August 01, 2026