Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For several reasons, the continuing advance of technology involves the use of standards setting organizations (“SSOs”). First, SSOs ensure that there are accepted technical standards in an industry, for example, to ensure interoperability of hardware and/or software products. Second, SSOs encourage the participation and collaboration of multiple members of the industry, thereby obtaining valuable contributions from parties who are normally highly competitive and otherwise might not work together. In addition, such standards provide a benefit to the end users (namely, the consumers of the goods or services governed by the standard) by allowing for economies of scale due to large-scale deployment of the technology covered by the standard, and thereby also helping to lower costs for new technologies.
In between the industry participants in the SSOs and the consumers, however, are the technology developers and owners. Many such developers and owners are armed with patent rights and thus have their own set of interests in the adoption of a particular technology standard, including receiving payment for licensing the patented technology covered by the standard. Even more interesting is the technology developer of an industry standard who also participates in the SSO. Recent developments in the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) governing the relationship between patent owners and SSOs provide guidance to all parties involved in the SSO process. These decisions suggest that the standards-setting process should have clear rules regarding disclosure of patents or patent applications that may cover the standard. Failure of 1) the SSO to promulgate clear rules, 2) a SSO participant to follow the SSO rules, or 3) a SSO participant to properly understand the acts of other SSO participants during the standard development and adoption process, can result in highly undesired results, such as expensive litigation or a need to license technology covering a widely deployed standard. On the other hand, a clear understanding of the SSO rules and process should prevent standards-based surprises for all involved parties.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.