Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a pair of cases with potential pocketbook impact on lawyers and their clients, the Supreme Court ruled on January 24th that the contingent fee portion of lawsuit settlements and awards is taxable to the client, even if the money goes directly to the attorney. But initial reaction to the 8-0 decision was more muted than expected because a law passed by Congress last fall limits the ruling's implications, and the decision won't doom the contingent fee system, which fuels a broad range of private litigation.
While the cases ' Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banaitis ' were pending last fall, Congress passed a provision allowing taxpayers who win awards in employment, whistleblower, and civil rights litigation not to count attorney fees and court costs as taxable income. [See the November 2004 edition of A&FP for coverage and background on that legislation.] Congress already allows this for lawyer fees in personal injury cases. In addition, Justice Anthony Kennedy, in his opinion for the Court, explicitly said he was not ruling on the tax implications of other federal laws that provide attorney fees, some of which exceed the award the plaintiff receives.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.