Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

FASB to Change Leveraged Lease Accounting Rules: LILO Settlements to Trigger Rerunning the Earnings

The Financial Accounting Standards Board met on Nov. 17, 2005 on the subject of the accounting impact of IRS settlements of Lease-In-Lease-Out ("LILO") and Lease-To-Service Contracts (aka "SILO"). To the surprise of the leasing industry, the FASB reached tentative conclusions that a change in the timing of cash flows requires a recalculation of the leveraged lease earnings and the lease classification should be re-examined. The recalculation of earnings results in a large, negative catch up adjustment and a positive adjustment to future earnings, but spread over the life of the lease. The lease classification issue should not be a problem.

13 minute read February 24, 2005 at 10:48 AM
By
Bill Bosco
FASB to Change Leveraged Lease Accounting Rules: LILO Settlements to Trigger Rerunning the Earnings

The Financial Accounting Standards Board met on Nov. 17, 2005 on the subject of the accounting impact of IRS settlements of Lease-In-Lease-Out (“LILO”) and Lease-To-Service Contracts (aka “SILO”).

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Adverse Possessor Provided Insufficient Evidence to Support TackingTown’s Installation of Guardrails Did Not Constitute a TakingMortgagee Entitled to Deficiency JudgmentLandowner Adequately Alleged Trespass During Renovation

August 13, 2026

Agentic AI introduces risks that are novel and complex, but the most effective response is a familiar one. Zero Trust answers the problem of when an AI agent misfires on its own by constraining what an agent can do rather than betting on how it will behave.

August 01, 2026