Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When faced with the unpredictable scope of e-discovery, today's corporate counsel require the adaptability of e-discovery teams to effectively manage electronic information involved in litigation. It seems a given maxim with sure results: Adaptability is a key component of being prepared. Indeed, by establishing clear lines of communication between its members, an effective e-discovery team is paramount to controlling costs and realizing production deadlines. Formalized lines of communication enable the team to quickly adapt as variables in the case change once the discovery process begins. Conversely, a corporation without such a team exposes itself to potentially problematic e-discovery efforts where spiraling costs and harried productions are common.
The team concept also balances the camps that often approach e-discovery from two distinct and, at times, conflicting vantage points: the legal and IT departments. And, of course, the means of assembling an e-discovery team shouldn't be an afterthought, but part of a firm's established, and evolving ' read that as adaptable ' business process.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.