Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
New York has long been known as a state in which a direct liability insurer need not prove prejudice in order to prevail on a defense that the policyholder provided late notice of an occurrence or a claim. New York ranks among the minority of states following the “no prejudice” rule. According to Ostrager, Barry R. and Newman, Thomas R.: Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes, approximately 80% of the states require a liability insurer to prove prejudice to prevail on the late notice defense, while the remainder either follow a straight “no prejudice” rule or adopt different rules for different types of insurance policies.
In the Dec. 21, 2004 decision in Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca Insurance Company, Inc., 787 N.Y.S.2d 22 (App. Div. 1st Dep't), a plurality ruling of the First Department of the Appellate Division observed that “the time has come” for New York to end its adherence to the “no prejudice” rule. 787 N.Y.S.2d at 27. Stating that “the egregious imbalance between insurer and insured needs to be corrected,” the court ruled that the insurer before it was not entitled to summary judgment because triable issues of fact existed as to whether the insurer was prejudiced by the policyholder's late notice of a potential claim. Id. at 28-29.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.