Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Parties engaged in private offshore outsourcing transactions (those not involving the provision of goods or services to federal or state governments) relaxed a bit last fall when it became apparent following the November elections that short-term prospects for federal anti-offshore outsourcing legislation had dimmed. Similarly, although bills that would have placed restraints on private offshoring were introduced in many state legislatures in 2004, most of these measures either were vetoed or have expired, making it appear unlikely that any substantial state anti-offshore outsourcing measures will be put in place in the near future. This does not mean, however, that certain other federal or state statutes or administrative rules might not impact a company's proposed offshore outsourcing transaction. In fact, depending on the nature of the transaction, existing regulations may have the indirect effect of making offshoring more difficult by imposing requirements on the outsourcing customer that must be flowed down to its offshore vendor. Such flow downs may either be expressly required by law or may simply be necessary to ensure that the customer is in compliance with its own regulatory obligations. Special attention to compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements is of particular importance in offshore outsourcing, where vendors may have no parallel experience complying with comparable local laws. Making sure that offshore outsourcing vendors understand and agree to comply with applicable U.S. statutes and administrative rules should be an important feature of every offshore outsourcing deal.
In order to assure such compliance, customers outsourcing work offshore need to implement a procedure to model their offshore outsourcing transactions in detail as part of the deal preparation process. The procedure should ensure that the customer: 1) identifies which regulatory provisions may impact the work being sent offshore and determines what needs to be done to comply with those provisions; 2) understands the specific outsourcing transaction in order to determine which regulatory provisions are impacted; and 3) communicates such requirements to the offshore vendor so that the vendor can implement appropriate measures to comply with the regulations.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.