Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Best Practices in Offshore Outsourcing

By Steve Semerdjian
April 27, 2005

Parties engaged in private offshore outsourcing transactions (those not involving the provision of goods or services to federal or state governments) relaxed a bit last fall when it became apparent following the November elections that short-term prospects for federal anti-offshore outsourcing legislation had dimmed. Similarly, although bills that would have placed restraints on private offshoring were introduced in many state legislatures in 2004, most of these measures either were vetoed or have expired, making it appear unlikely that any substantial state anti-offshore outsourcing measures will be put in place in the near future. This does not mean, however, that certain other federal or state statutes or administrative rules might not impact a company's proposed offshore outsourcing transaction. In fact, depending on the nature of the transaction, existing regulations may have the indirect effect of making offshoring more difficult by imposing requirements on the outsourcing customer that must be flowed down to its offshore vendor. Such flow downs may either be expressly required by law or may simply be necessary to ensure that the customer is in compliance with its own regulatory obligations. Special attention to compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements is of particular importance in offshore outsourcing, where vendors may have no parallel experience complying with comparable local laws. Making sure that offshore outsourcing vendors understand and agree to comply with applicable U.S. statutes and administrative rules should be an important feature of every offshore outsourcing deal.

In order to assure such compliance, customers outsourcing work offshore need to implement a procedure to model their offshore outsourcing transactions in detail as part of the deal preparation process. The procedure should ensure that the customer: 1) identifies which regulatory provisions may impact the work being sent offshore and determines what needs to be done to comply with those provisions; 2) understands the specific outsourcing transaction in order to determine which regulatory provisions are impacted; and 3) communicates such requirements to the offshore vendor so that the vendor can implement appropriate measures to comply with the regulations.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.