Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Parties to a medical malpractice trial seek fair and impartial jurors to render a verdict. Jurors must decide a case based on the evidence presented and the court's instructions. A juror's impartiality serves as the bedrock of our civil justice system. Should a biased juror sit in judgment, the process becomes tainted and the verdict is not credible.
To ensure a fair and impartial jury, most jurisdictions permit voir dire of prospective jurors. During voir dire, jurors are asked questions that allow the court and parties to determine whether a juror may be biased. In many states, attorneys ask jurors questions during voir dire. In some states, however, the court asks jurors questions, frequently with the parties' input. During the process, the questions are often general and benign. In a typical malpractice case, for example, jurors are asked about their education and employment, their experience with the health-care professions, and their knowledge of and experience with the medical condition involved in the particular case. Those questions rarely meet with opposition.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.