Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Computer Forensics Docket Sheet
Summary Judgment Denied In Light of
Conflicting Computer Forensics Testimony
The plaintiff filed suit against the defendant, claiming copyright infringement, breach of contract and trade secret theft. The plaintiff claimed he wrote a computer program prior to his employment with the defendant for which the defendant promised him compensation. The defendant failed to pay and developed a similar program after the plaintiff terminated his employment. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff wrote the program during his employment, counterclaimed with similar allegations, and sought a declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment. Contending summary judgment was inappropriate, the plaintiff argued that date and time stamps on floppy discs containing the code proved that he created the program prior to working for the defendant. The plaintiff presented a computer forensic expert's affidavit that indicated it would have been an “enormous task” to change the date and time stamps associated with the files on the floppies. The defendant offered an opinion by another expert who stated that it would be “relatively easy to doctor the time and date stamps on the floppy discs containing [the plaintiff's] original code.” Declining to grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, the court found that a genuine issue of material fact existed and declared, “[a]ny determination as to which expert to believe … belongs to the jury.” Fowler v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 2005 WL 548076 (N.D.Tex. Mar. 9, 2005).
Michele C.S. Lange Charity Delich http://www.krollontrack.com/ [email protected]
Summary Judgment Denied In Light of
Conflicting Computer Forensics Testimony
The plaintiff filed suit against the defendant, claiming copyright infringement, breach of contract and trade secret theft. The plaintiff claimed he wrote a computer program prior to his employment with the defendant for which the defendant promised him compensation. The defendant failed to pay and developed a similar program after the plaintiff terminated his employment. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff wrote the program during his employment, counterclaimed with similar allegations, and sought a declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment. Contending summary judgment was inappropriate, the plaintiff argued that date and time stamps on floppy discs containing the code proved that he created the program prior to working for the defendant. The plaintiff presented a computer forensic expert's affidavit that indicated it would have been an “enormous task” to change the date and time stamps associated with the files on the floppies. The defendant offered an opinion by another expert who stated that it would be “relatively easy to doctor the time and date stamps on the floppy discs containing [the plaintiff's] original code.” Declining to grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, the court found that a genuine issue of material fact existed and declared, “[a]ny determination as to which expert to believe … belongs to the jury.” Fowler v.
Michele C.S. Lange Charity Delich http://www.krollontrack.com/ [email protected]
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.