Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
To read some accounts, the review of “native” files is the Holy Grail in electronic discovery. As the story goes, the ability to review documents in their original format will provide perfect insight into the treasure trove of discoverable information. To read others, reviewing in native formats is the road to ruin, the tipping point to calamity. Perhaps, somewhere between these extremes lies the truth. Demystifying this notion, electronic discovery, using files in their native format, has some drawbacks and some advantages. In the end it's an understanding of these pros and cons that may permit the savvy litigator to gain a true advantage.
No Set Format Rules
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.