Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Non-Debtor Insurance in Asbestos Bankruptcies: What Is the Future?

By Robert D. Goodman and Steve Vaccaro
April 28, 2005

In the few short years since Fuller-Austin was decided, the use of “prepack” bankruptcies has become a favored approach to resolving asbestos liabilities, often with the threat of a “Fuller-Austin result” as a hammer over the insurers asked to pick up the tab. Here's the drill: A policyholder uses section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code to channel its present and future asbestos liabilities to a trust; under policyholder's reorganization plan, the trust is funded in significant part with insurance rights; the insurers cannot object to the plan because it is said not to affect their interests; yet plan confirmation triggers coverage for the entire liability in an amount (often a nine or 10 digit amount) to be determined at a later date. See Fuller-Austin Insulation Co., 2002 WL 31005090 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Aug. 6, 2002) (appeal pending). The pressure this Fuller-Austin play puts on insurers leads many to settle their coverage obligations ' often a rational response to a high-stakes game in which insurers have few sources of leverage.

Seeking to expand both the scope of the 524(g) injunction and the pot of available insurance assets, proponents of some asbestos prepacks have moved to “bolt-on” to pending asbestos bankruptcies various non-debtor liabilities, accompanied by assignments of non-debtor policy rights to pay for them. Such “bolt-ons” were proposed in the Federal Mogul and Combustion Engineering prepacks. A somewhat similar approach emerged in the non-prepack Pittsburgh-Corning bankruptcy. Pittsburgh-Corning differs from the bolt-on prepacks in several important respects, including the broad consensual involvement of many insurers and a significant shared insurance program among the debtor and the non-debtors.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.